Reasons Why People Do Not Believe in Jesus

In the last blog, we listed three contradictions within the Christian doctrine of salvation.  In this blog, we will explore the first contradiction which we have stated as follows:  How can a loving and just God condemn people to hell because they do not believe in Jesus if that reason is because they either have never heard of Jesus or their culture and/or religion tells them Jesus is irrelevant.

Those Who Have Never Heard

There are a multitude of examples of people around the world who have lived and died without ever hearing of Christ.  St. Patrick did not bring the message of Christ to Ireland until around 430 AD.  The Aborigine people have lived in Australia for thousands of years and the European settlers did not arrive until the 1700’s.  So for hundreds of years the Irish and the Aborigine people lived and died without a chance to accept Christ.  The fact is the majority of people who have ever lived have never heard of the God of Israel or of Jesus. [1]  Faced with the injustice illustrated in these facts, Christians often quote Romans 1:20-25 which states God has revealed himself to everyone on earth through nature and therefore everyone on earth is without excuse.  The problem is there is a huge difference between believing in God, and believing in Jesus and his death for our sins.  Don Richardson, in Eternity in Their Hearts, tells us of the Gedeo in Ethiopia; the Mbaka in the Central Africa Republic; the Karen, Kachin, Lahu, and Wa of Burma; the Lisu of China; the Santal, Naga and Mizo of India; and many others, all of whom had traditions of the one true God who created the world.  These peoples believed in a supreme God but for generations no one told them about Christ.  Many of these cultures, when they heard of Christ, turned to him in vast numbers. [2]  Previous generations would undoubtedly have done the same.  If God truly wants everyone to be saved, why did he not inform them of Jesus?

It is so easy for Christians to hold the current view of salvation because they know it will never affect them.  So let us state this in a more personal way.  Imagine that you, the reader, were born in Central America in the year 800 AD.  You lived your whole life believing in the Mayan religion you in which you were raised.  You lived your whole life doing your best to follow the teachings of your religion:  you fasted, prayed, offered sacrifices, and participated in religious ceremonies to the many gods the Mayans worshipped.  When you stand before the judgment seat of God, he tells you he is sending you to hell for eternity because you did not accept Jesus as your Savior.  You respond that you never heard of Jesus and ask:  Who he is?  God tells you who Jesus is but states that you are still going to hell.  Is this fair?  Is this just?  Is this the action of a God of love?

Those Who Have Heard

Some Christians, when faced with the obvious injustice described above, concede that God will make exceptions for those who have never heard of Christ and offer ways in which this might happen (e.g. I Peter 3:18-20, I Peter 4:6, Ephesians 4:7-9 might indicate that God will give people a chance to accept Christ after they die). [3]  However, most will assert those who have heard of Christ but do not accept him as their Savior will face eternal damnation.  Is this belief valid?

In his book on the defense of Christianity, The Case for Christ, Lee Strobel interviews Louis S. Lapides.  Mr. Lapides was raised in the Jewish religion and reports that issue of the Messiah never was discussed in his family.  If the topic of Jesus came up in his family or in Hebrew school, it was only in a derogatory manner.  As a consequence, he developed negative attitudes toward Christians and expected the New Testament to be a handbook on anti-Semitism. [4]  Dr. Laura is a radio personality who gives moral advice to her listeners.  Most Christians agree with her moral stance but her religious beliefs are Jewish.  Will God eternally condemn those who believe in the Jewish religion and live their lives in accordance with the Old Testament because their upbringing taught them Jesus was not relevant?

People who have heard of Jesus do have valid reasons for not believing in him.  Certain cultures and religions teach Jesus was just a prophet or a good man.  If we grew up in such a culture, how would we know it was in error?  All of us find it difficult to question the culture in which we are brought up.  As we grow up, our culture presents us with its view of the world and most of the time we simply accept (believe) that worldview.  There is a reason we are so accepting of our culture:  It facilitates human progress.  If each of us did not learn from our culture, we would repeat the same experiences and make the same mistakes throughout our life that our ancestors did.  By assimilating the knowledge, values, and norms of our culture, we and our culture advance.  For example, our telephones, cars, houses, and all of our modern conveniences did not spring up overnight.  They are the result of scientific discoveries and business ideas that have been centuries in the making as one generation teaches another what they have learned.

Adopting the norms of our society does have a negative side:  We accept what our society tells us without any analysis of the validity of those norms.  When those norms are challenged, it is so easy to automatically assume our beliefs are right and that includes our religious beliefs.  Christians are no different than anyone else in the world.  How many Christians do you know who have seriously studied Islam, Hinduism, or Buddhism to determine if they are superior to Christianity?  Very few have.  So how can Christians criticize people of other religions for not considering Christianity?

God obviously knows the difficulty of transmitting ideas from one culture to another and from one age to another because he made us the way we are.  So why did he not send Jesus to every culture and age if he truly wants everyone to be saved?

In the next blog we will examine the problems with proving Jesus rose from the dead.

_________________________

[1]   John Sanders, What About Those Who Have Never Heard? (Downers Grove, IL:  InterVarsity Press, 1995), p. 9.

[2]   Don Richardson, Eternity in Their Hearts (Ventura, CA:  Regal Books, 1984), pp. 41-108.

[3]   Gabriel Fackre, “Divine Perseverance”, ed. John Sanders, What About Those Who Have Never Heard? (Downers Grove, IL:  InterVarsity Press, 1995), pp. 71-95.

[4]   Lee Strobel, The Case for Christ (Grand Rapids, MI:  Zondervan Publishing House, 1998), pp. 173-174.

Posted in Salvation | 7 Comments

Questions about the Christian Doctrine of Salvation

The first question we will ask about Christianity in this blog concerns the doctrine of salvation.  According to the doctrinal statements of virtually all of the Christian religions, anyone who wants to spend eternity in heaven with God must believe that Jesus Christ existed, died for our sins, and rose from the dead.  This doctrine is a central tenant of the Christian faith; it is part of what makes Christianity different from other religions and philosophies.  This is an exclusive claim; all who do not accept Jesus Christ will be condemned to hell for eternity.

On such an important doctrine as this, it is imperative we understand the logical consequences of that belief.  As philosophy has long taught us, if we discover inconsistencies or contradictions within a particular belief we must question the validity of that belief.  The Christian philosopher David Elton Trueblood instructs us:  “It is not intellectually honest to hold a position after it is known that the position leads inevitably to other positions which are recognized as false”. [1]  The effectiveness of examining our beliefs for contradictions is illustrated by Albert Einstein.  He stated part of how he came to his revolutionary theories of the universe was to examine contradictions in scientific beliefs that were apparent for years but, for a variety of reasons, ignored. [2]  As a result of Einstein’s work, scientists now have a better understanding of how our universe is constructed.  Likewise, by examining our Christian beliefs for contradictions, we will either further verify our beliefs or we will discover areas in which our understanding of how God relates to us is deficient and needs to be revised.

Because Christians claim that Jesus is the only way we can be saved and go to heaven, three questions immediately surface.

1.      How can God be a God of love and justice and yet condemn people to hell who either have not heard of Jesus or whose culture and/or religion tells them Jesus is irrelevant?

2.      God made us finite; he constructed our existence so certainty in regards to historical events is not absolute.  For example, while there is substantial evidence for the resurrection of Jesus, there will always remain an element of doubt.  So how can God condemn people to hell for not believing in something for which they cannot obtain certain proof?

3.      God seems to confuse the issue of what salvation is.  There are at least 70 verses in the New Testament which state salvation is obtained through belief in God or through our conduct, pattern of behavior, motivation, use of abilities, and repentance.  If belief in Jesus is the only way to heaven, why did God include these verses in the Bible?

Contradictions

What should we do about these contradictions?  Most of us acknowledge these problems but respond in ways that do not resolve the issue.  Either we repeat the answers Christians have used for years (we will show in future blogs those answers are not valid) or, because we have no answer, we essentially ignore it.  Some ignore this problem by asserting that God knows what he is doing and we will find an answer to this problem when God explains it to us in heaven.  I do not have a problem if Christians rely on their faith to resolve this issue but it does not work for me for two reasons.  First, both of these responses do not make these contradictions go away and these contradictions only serve to drive people away from Christ.  Second, like Pascal, I believe there must be a resolution of all contradictory passages in the Bible or God has no meaning at all. [3]  On an issue as critical as the salvation of our souls, I cannot believe God has constructed our existence like some Alice in Wonderland world in which we must believe in a half a dozen impossible things before breakfast [4] if we want to be saved.  If there is a contradiction in our theology, the most likely explanation is our interpretation of the Bible is in error—we do not fully understand what God is telling us.

I believe there is a resolution to these contradictions.  In the next three (3) blogs, we will explore in detail each of the contradictions we have listed to ensure we fully understand the problem.  It is imperative we have a full grasp of the problems we face before we attempt to resolve these issues.

_________________________

[1]   David Elton Trueblood, General Philosophy (New York:  Harper & Row:  1963), pp. 9-10.

[2]   Ronald W. Clark, Einstein:  The Life and Times (New York:  The World Publishing Company, 1971), p. 86.

[3]   A. J. Krailsheimer, Trans., Pascal:  Pensées, (Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England:  Penguin Books, 1966), p.106.

[4]   Lewis Carroll, Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking Glass (Mahwah, NJ:  Watermill Press, 1983), p. 187.

Posted in Salvation | Leave a comment

Asking Questions About Christianity — My Journey

Why am I writing this blog?  I am just a Christian layman.  I do not claim to be a theologian or a philosopher.  What I have done for 40 years is to spend a considerable amount of time reading, thinking, and asking questions about life and Christianity.  The result is that I believe to have found some answers.

I was raised in the evangelical Protestant Christian community.  I attended Sunday morning, Sunday evening, and Wednesday evening services for the first 20 years of my life.  I attended Christian high schools for four years.  I studied theology at a Christian Bible institute for two and one-half years.  During most of this time, I believed what I was taught; I asked no questions.  There was no reason to question.  The Christian community of which I was a part was so convinced they were right, they had long ago stopped searching for the truth.  If any questions were asked, they were solely to find ways to support their belief system.

What changed my thinking about asking questions was attending a Christian Bible institute which put me in the middle of a major metropolitan city.  I did not see Christianity having a major impact on that city and I started to ask why.  The entire Bible teaches us how awesome God is.  Colossians 2:9-10 tells us God’s power was embodied in Jesus and we are complete in him which means all Christians have access to that power.  My question was:  Why do we not see this power displayed in Christianity?  No one has accused modern day Christianity of turning the world, let alone a city, upside down as the people of Thessalonica accused the early Christians (Acts 17:6).  Why?

So I began to raise various questions about Christianity.  Unable to obtain satisfactory answers at the Bible institute I was attending, I became rebellious, flouted the rules, and was summarily dismissed.  For the next 25 years, I wandered a no man’s land in regards to my beliefs.  The questions I had about the Christian faith remain unresolved and I could not subscribe to any of the philosophies of the secular world or the other religions because they too had problems within their belief systems.

My questions (which we will discuss later in this blog) surfaced because of contradictions between what I observed in the world and what I was told the Bible said.  The questions I asked were nothing new; they have been asked for ages and the readers of this blog undoubtedly have at times asked similar questions.  The fact that we still discuss these problems demonstrated Christians have not been successful in answering them.

During my search for answers, I heard or read many explanations by various Christian authors who attempted to explain the seemingly contradictions between the Bible and what I observed in the world.  However, those explanations sounded more like an argument thought up to justify an already established position rather than an honest inquiry into the truth.  Gopi Krishna, the mystic from India, recounts his experiences and expresses how I felt:

I thirsted for rationality in religion, for the worship of truth, whatever and wherever that might be.  There was no spectacle more painful for me than the sight of a conscientious and intelligent man defending an absurdity which even a child could see through, simply because it formed an article of faith to which he must hold at any cost, even if that cost included the sacrifice of reason and truth. [1]

A typical Christian response to Gopi Krishna’s statement would be that at times God’s ways will be above our understanding (Isaiah 55:8-9).  Because God is infinite and we are finite, it is to be expected we would have difficulty understanding why God does everything the way he does.  However, relying on Isaiah’s statement to justify all manner of irrational belief is mistaken.  Isaac Watts, who most Christians remember from the hymns he wrote, says:  divine revelation cannot be “inconsistent with reason; for intelligent creatures can never be bound to believe real inconsistencies”. [2]  David Elton Trueblood, a Christian philosopher, tells us that if we allow contradictions in our belief system, intelligent discourse might as well come to an end. [3]  How can we expect people to take Christianity seriously if we do not resolve these contradictions in major tenants of our beliefs?

Pascal maintains there must be a resolution of all contradictory passages in the Bible or God has no meaning at all. [4]  The God who gave us a rational mind cannot expect us to ignore it when the issue of our religious beliefs arises.  Trueblood describes the approach we must take when we examine our religious faith.

There is really no hope for the Christian faith apart from tough-mindedness in matters of belief.  If God is not, then the sooner we find it out the better.  If belief in God is not true, it is an evil and should be eliminated from our entire universe of discourse.  False belief is evil because it diverts energy from practical tasks that require attention.  If prayer is not an objective encounter with the Living God, we shall do well to make this discovery and give up the nonsense as soon as possible. [5]

Several times during my Christian upbringing I remember hearing from or reading about people who stated they were dragged kicking and screaming into the kingdom of God.  In other words, the evidence for Christianity was so compelling to them that they were persuaded to believe even though they did not want to believe.  I distinctly remember feeling just the opposite.  I wanted to believe in what Christianity taught.  I was totally immersed it for my entire childhood and teenage years.  But because of unanswered questions, I felt like I was being dragged kicking and screaming out of the kingdom of God.  For twenty five years my associations with Christians was minimal (except for my family).  For twenty five years I rarely read the Bible.  Every time someone would give me a book to read that was to answer my questions, the book would contain information that confirmed the validity of the questions I was asking.

So where did I go to find answers?  Strangely, the answer was to go back to the Bible.  My various readings lead me to the conclusion that I needed to read the Bible again.  It was a paradigm shattering experience because the Bible was so familiar but at the same time it was so new.  What I read took me by surprise and I started to organize my thoughts by writing them down.  As I went through the process of re-evaluating the claims of Christianity, I discovered my complaint against God had been misplaced.  As happens so often the course in human affairs, God is blamed for much that is not of his doing.  The problem, as usual, is with us humans.  We are fallible, we are creatures of habit, we are products of our culture, and we find it difficult to think “outside the box” in which we have grown up.

The purpose of this blog is to stimulate a discussion of how God relates to us.  It, at times, does not conform to traditional Christian belief.  What I have tried to do is to look at what the Bible says with an open mind.  My search for what the Bible actually says has not always taken me in the direction I always wanted to go but that is to be expected.  I make no claim to have found all the answers.  I am quite willing, as all of us should be, to modify my beliefs provided the answers to the questions I have raised are logical and based on the Bible.  I only ask of the readers that they have the same openness to the ideas presented in this blog.

________________________

1.         Gopi Krishna, Living with Kundalini (Boston:  Shambhala Publications, Inc., 1993), p. 80.

2.         Isaac Watts, Logic:  The Right Use of Reason in the Inquiry after Truth (Morgan, PA:  Soli Deo Gloria Publications, 1996), p. 263.

3.         David Elton Trueblood, General Philosophy (New York:  Harper & Row:  1963), pp. 9-10.

4.         A. J. Krailsheimer, Trans., Pascal:  Pensées, (Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England:  Penguin Books, 1966), p.106.

5.         David Elton Trueblood, A Place to Stand (New York:  Harper & Row, 1969), p. 19.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments